“The importance of actively monitoring these practices has been recognized at the highest levels of scientific governance. The Hong Kong Principles advocate for researchers to be evaluated based on the transparency and openness of their work. UNESCO’s 2021 Recommendation on Open Science and the G7 Science, echoed by initiatives like the Open Science Monitoring Initiative (OSMI), have similarly underscored monitoring as a priority. A consensus is also emerging on which practices should be tracked: a core set of 19 open science practices has been proposed as reference indicators for systematic monitoring in biomedicine, based on a Delphi study.”
NEWS
OSMI needs you! Tell us what you think of the Principles of Open Science Monitoring self-assessment grid
OSMI is pleased to share the first version of a self-assessment grid to help initiatives evaluate how well they comply ...
Missed the 2026 OSMI plenary? The recording and presentation are now available!
The OSMI 2026 plenary took place on 30 September; on the agenda were an update from the Coordination Committee, the ...
New report on scoping the needs of Open Science monitoring
OSMI Working Group 1 (WG1) has recently published a report “Scoping the needs of Open Science Monitoring”, now available on ...