“Our review of Open Access definitions and typologies was conducted on a global dataset of Open Access monitors drawn from two sources. Firstly, Schneider and Pampel’s (2025) open dataset of Open Science dashboards (n=58). Secondly, the list of Open Science monitors curated by the Open Science Monitoring Initiative (n=73)”. (…) “The Principles of Open Science Monitoring call for indicators that are both comparable and context-sensitive. This double stake highlights the ambiguity of OA monitors, which have both epistemic aims (empirically documenting academic publishing) and more normative policy objectives”.
NEWS
OSMI needs you! Tell us what you think of the Principles of Open Science Monitoring self-assessment grid
OSMI is pleased to share the first version of a self-assessment grid to help initiatives evaluate how well they comply ...
Missed the 2026 OSMI plenary? The recording and presentation are now available!
The OSMI 2026 plenary took place on 30 September; on the agenda were an update from the Coordination Committee, the ...
New report on scoping the needs of Open Science monitoring
OSMI Working Group 1 (WG1) has recently published a report “Scoping the needs of Open Science Monitoring”, now available on ...