“Our review of Open Access definitions and typologies was conducted on a global dataset of Open Access monitors drawn from two sources. Firstly, Schneider and Pampel’s (2025) open dataset of Open Science dashboards (n=58). Secondly, the list of Open Science monitors curated by the Open Science Monitoring Initiative (n=73)”. (…) “The Principles of Open Science Monitoring call for indicators that are both comparable and context-sensitive. This double stake highlights the ambiguity of OA monitors, which have both epistemic aims (empirically documenting academic publishing) and more normative policy objectives”.
NEWS
Advancing Open Science Monitoring: insights from the FORM/OSMI co-hosted webinar
OSMI was delighted to co-host a webinar with FORM (Forum for Open Research in MENA) to introduce the Principles of ...
OSMI Board meeting: updates from June 2026
On June 24, 2026, the Open Science Monitoring Initiative (OSMI) Board convened online to discuss ongoing projects, working group updates, ...
OSMI Working Group 3 is seeking case studies from scholarly content providers
The OSMI Working Group ‘Open science monitoring with scholarly content providers’ is seeking submissions of case studies from scholarly content ...